Parker/Broking Debate on Marriage/Divorce/Remarriage
Gerry Parker's Third Rebuttal
Proposition:
The Bible teaches that when Matthew 19:6 marriage ends in divorce,
the only party with scriptural authority to marry another is one innocent of
fornication, who put away a spouse guilty of fornication.
My position from the outset is the same as it is now. And that is that the Guilty
Party (the one who guilty of fornication)can marry again without sinning (Matt.
19:9).
Darrell has not proven otherwise. He has tried to say that the FORNICATOR
continues in adultery when he marries again. He says that because of the tense
that this must mean continuing action. For the most part this argument has been
abandoned by most Bible scholars because this just does not hold any water
based upon the text. Even those who once made such arguments no longer do
(See Mac Deaver and Olan Hicks debate).
I have repeatedly asked Darrell one question that he never answered. I hope that
says something to you and to Darrell. I offer it again for your consideration as
well as Darrell's.
The man made tradition that Darrell adheres to is that ADULTERY is having sex
with someone other than your spouse (or something similar to that). It is because
of this definition that Darrell proclaims that the Guilty Party is Living in Adultery
when he marries again.
My question to him and to any who hold this position is simple. If this is true,
WHO IS THE GUILTY PARTY STILL MARRIED TO WHEN HE MARRIES
AGAIN? I even simplified it as best as I could so that Darrell could see his
inconsistency.
For clarification, lets do that one more time.
Let us say Tom and Susan are married. Sue learns that Tom has committed
fornication. She then divorces him. Sue then has the right to marry again (we
agree on this point)and she does in time.
Tom meets a lady after a few years. Her name is Debbie. She has never been
married before. Tom and Debbie get married. Darrell says they are Living in
Adultery. If this is true then Tom must be married to someone other than
Debbie. So I asked Darrell to tell us who Tom (of course it could be any name)is
married to? Darrell never answered the question.
Darrell says Tom is in ADULTERY. I can accept that if Darrell will tell us to
whom Tom is married. Is Tom married to Debbie? Darrell says no. They are in
ADULTERY. Okay Darrell, who is Tom married to? Is Tom still married to
Susan? Darrell refused to answer. But I know why he did not answer. She has
married someone else and we both agree she is free to do so. So the question
remains, who is Tom still married to if he is indeed Living in Adultery with
Debbie? Silence from Darrell. Is Tom even married to God? Darrell was still silent.
The reason for Darrell's silence is that Tom is married to no one else but
Debbie. There is no living in adultery. Part of the problem that Darrell has is his
definition of ADULTERY. If one reviews the exchanges one will see this is the
case.
To put it plain and simple when we say that the Guilty Party can not remarry we
are adding to God's word. And when we examine the logic behind Darrell's
position it is clear that it will not hold water.
In closing I would like to state two things;
1. God wants all of us to be faithful to our spouses. He wants one man and one
woman for life. That should be our goal. However, sin enters in to the picture
sometimes and we need to be careful and not go beyond what God says. Should
someone commit fornication? Of course not. But when it does happen we start
from where we are and go forward. We must learn that we cannot unscramble
scrambled eggs. This exchange came about because I had made a positive
reference to Joe Beams organization, Family Dynamics. This organization has
saved many marriages. I would recommend anyone seek their help if you are
having marital problems and even if you are not having problems, they can help
you strengthen your good marriage. You can find them on the internet or go to
Grace Centered Magazine and you can get information there.
2. I also recommend that you get the following resources;
a. What The Bible Says About Marriage, Divorce And Remarriage by Olan
Hicks
b. AN In Depth Study of Marriage And Divorce by John L. Edwards (publisher-
College Press)
c. Maxey-Broking Debate (You can find this on Al Maxey's website,
www.zianet.com/maxey or you may go to BereanSpirit@yahoogroups.com and
access it through there).
d. The Divorced & Remarried: Who would come to God by Homer Hailey
e. Divorce and Remarriage-The Hicks Deaver Debate (Olan Hicks and Mac
Deaver).
Thanks Darrell for asking for this exchange. I am sure you agree with me that we
hope this may help someone who is searching for some answers on this topic.
Offered in Love, Gerry Parker
Affirm: Darrell Broking
Deny: Gerry Parker