Strom/Mowery Debate on Premillenialism
Dub Mowery's Third Affirmative
Proposition:
The view of PREMILLENNIALISM, as viewed by the SEVENTH DAY
ADVENTIST, is unscriptural.
Affirm: Dub Mowery
Deny: Bob Strom
Bob, by your persistence in looking at the figurative language of
the last four chapters of Revelation as being literal, you are
forced to either pervert or ignore other passages of scripture
that actually speak in literal terms. Revelation 19:11-21 and
Revelation 20:10-15 are both referring to the Great Day of
Judgment. The figurative language of Revelation 19:11-21 is
simply revealing that false religion (referred to as the false
prophet) and ungodly forces (referred to as the beast) along with
those who lived worldly lives will be completely overcome by the
Lord and His sword. His sword is not a literal sword (Rev. 9:21;
1:16). Since this is symbolic language, it will be helpful for
us to look elsewhere in the scripture to obtain light on this
matter. At Ephesians 6:17, we learn that, "...the sword of the
Spirit, which is the word of God:" And at Hebrews 4:12, the
inspired Word of God is compared to a sword. That passage
declares: "For the word of God is quick, and powerful, and
sharper than any two edged sword, piercing even to the dividing
asunder of soul and spirit, and of the joints and marrow; and is
a discerner of the thoughts and intents of the heart." The power
of the Lord's Word will be exercised on the Great Day of Judgment
in that it will determine the eternal destiny of the entire human
race. Our Lord informs us, that, "He that rejecteth me, and
receiveth not my words, hath one that judgeth him: the word that
I have spoken, the same shall judge him in the last day" (John
12:48). For you to insist that Revelation 19:11-21 be recognized
as what will literally take place when our Lord returns would
have Him actually riding a white horse and physically killing all
the unrighteous with a literal sword that extends out of His
mouth. The truth taught in that context is that false religion
and ungodly forces will be eternally condemned. There will not
be any chance or hope of them escaping the eternal consequence of
their sins. It is figuratively compared to a besieged city that
is leveled and all inhabitants therein destroyed. By your
insistence on interpreting figurative language as if it were
literal, causes that approach to the inspired Word of God to
contradict plain passages of scripture elsewhere. You then
attempt to change the meaning of those scriptures from that which
is plainly taught to harmonize with your unfounded theory. John
5:28-29 is a prime example of those passages in which you are
attempting to change what is actually taught by them. Your
futile effort to pervert that passage by claiming that the hour
of the resurrection of both the righteous and the unrighteous
does not refer to a specific hour of the day. In your effort to
uphold the concept of two literal physical resurrections, you had
to claim that the hour of John 5:28-29 did not mean a specific
hour of a day. Bob, you then gave at least 3 or 4 verses from
the book of John where the word "hour" had reference to a long
period of time. You then made the assumption that proved the
hour of John 5:28-29 also meant a long period of time, a thousand
years. I demonstrated in my second affirmative that evolutionist
could use the same strategy in their attempt to prove that the
six days of creation were long geological periods of time.
However, your effort did not prove that the word "hour" as used
by the Apostle John always meant a long period of time. Here are
some of the scripture references in the gospel of John in which
an hour definitely meant a specific hour of the day. They are as
follows: (John 1:39; 4:6, 52; 19:14). There are probably other
passages in the gospel of John in which the word hour specified a
particular hour of the day. Therefore, your effort to prove that
the hour of John 5:28-29 does not mean a certain hour of day was
not accomplished. Acts 24:15 definitely reveals that there will
be only one resurrection of the physically dead. That passage
states, "And have hope toward God, which they themselves also
allow, that there shall be a resurrection of the dead, both of
the just and unjust." That passage speaks of a singular
resurrection of the just and unjust. It speaks of "a
resurrection", not "first resurrection and second resurrection",
or "resurrections". These two passages prove your theory of two
separate resurrections of the dead to be false.
Your response to the description of the Great Day of Judgment
recorded at Matthew 25:31-46 is a dodge to the plain description
therein.
You state:
First notice--NO mention of the resurrection of the wicked.
Dub
Bob, I might add that there is not any mention of the
resurrection of the righteous either. The immediate subject was
not the resurrection of the dead, but rather the eternal judgment
of both the righteous and unrighteous. The scripture elsewhere
reveals that the resurrection of both the righteous and
unrighteous will take place before the general judgment. Also,
the resurrection of all the physically dead will be for the
purpose of being eternally judged (John 5:28-29). The
Apostle Paul wrote by inspiration, "For we must all appear
before the judgment seat of Christ; that every one may receive
the things done in his body, according to that he hath done,
whether it be good or bad" (II Cor. 5:10).
Bob, you further state,
Also notice that the righteous and wicked appear to be already
living together on earth. Nations are mixed and the saints have
not inherited the kingdom yet.
Dub here:
Matthew 25:31-46 is not a description of the saints living among
the unrighteous, but rather the Day of Judgment in which the
entire human race is judged according to how they lived. When
preparation was being made for this debate, my original
proposition included the declaration that the kingdom of Christ
was established on the first Pentecost after the resurrection of
Christ. At that time, you claimed that you agreed with that.
The moderators can back me up on that fact! And yet, you now
claim that the saints have not inherited the kingdom yet. You
seem to be mixed up on this point. At the end of time our Lord
shall return to receive His kingdom (the redeemed) and deliver it
to the Heavenly Father (I Cor. 15:23-28).
Since the book of Revelation is a book written primarily in
symbolic language (Rev. 1:1), we need to consider the location of
the Apostle John when he received supernaturally the series of
visions that make up that book. In contrast to this, the Apostle
Paul speaks of a man caught up into the third heaven into
paradise, "...and heard unspeakable words, which it is not lawful
for a man to utter" (II Cor. 12:1-4). It is important for us to
remember where the Apostle John was located when he received the
series of visions. John was on the isle of Patmos (Rev. 1:9).
From that viewpoint he received the different visions in which he
records as the book of Revelation. This is obviously why the
vision of the eternal home of the redeemed was brought down for
John to view. He wrote: "And I saw a new heaven and a new
earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed
away; and there was no more sea. And I John saw the holy city
new Jerusalem, coming down from God out of heaven, prepared as a
bride adorned for her husband" (Rev. 21:1). Now keep in mind
what John saw was visions. Other passages of scripture use
similar terminology concerning the eternal abode of the righteous
(They are: Isa. 65:17; Isa. 66:22; and II Pet. 3:13). Many
erroneously interpret all four of those passages to teach that
the redeemed will live eternally on a physical earth with the
Lord after this present life is over. Such an interpretation of
those passages contradict other passages of scripture. In
referring to the literal physical world, Jesus declared, "Heaven
and earth shall pass away,..." (Matt. 24:35). The Apostle Peter
wrote about the second coming of Christ and the destruction of
the physical universe with these words: "But the day of the
Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens
shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt
with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein
shall be burned up. Seeing then that all these things shall be
dissolved, what manner of persons ought ye to be in all holy
conversation and godliness. Looking for and hasting unto the
coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall
be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
Nevertheless we, according to his promise, look for new heavens
and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness" (II Pet. 3:10-
13). Thus, the physical universe will pass away when Jesus
Christ returns at the end of time. This will not provide a
period of time for the Son of God to take the righteous to heaven
for 1,000 years and then return to inhabit a renovated earth
forever with the righteous. Jesus is presently preparing an
eternal home for the righteous in the heaven of heavens (John
14:1-3; II Cor. 5:1). As long as we live in a physical body we
will not enjoy our eternal home in heaven (II Cor. 5:1-9; I Cor.
15:50-57). Therefore, the new heaven and earth will be the
eternal home of the soul in which our Lord is now preparing for
us. With this in mind, we should heed these words of our Lord:
"Lay not up for yourselves treasures upon earth, where moth and
rust doth corrupt, and where thieves break through and steal:
But lay up for yourselves treasures in heaven, where neither moth
nor rust doth corrupt, and where thieves do not break through nor
steal: For where your treasure is, there will your heart be
also" (Matt. 6:19-21). Rather than placing our affections on a
physical earth, the Apostle Paul urges us with the following
words, "If ye then be risen with Christ, seek those things which
are above, where Christ sitteth on the right hand of God. Set
your affection on things above, not on things on the earth"
(Col. 3:1-2).
Bob, I have refrained from using catty remarks toward you during
our written debate. I am more interested in truth and both your
soul and mine. It is my prayer that both of us will take time
later to carefully go back over all of the material that you and
I have presented in light of the inspired Word of God.
Sincerely,
Dub Mowery