Stringer/Bunch Debate on Christmas
Larry Bunch's Third Rebuttal
Proposition:
It is sinful for the Christian to celebrate the holiday known as
Christmas, even if they attach no religious significance to it.
Affirmed: Jason E. Stringer
Denied: Larry Bunch
Larry's 3rd Negative
Proposition: It is sinful for the Christian to celebrate the
holiday known as Christmas, even if they attach no religious
significance to it.
Affirmed: Jason E. Stringer
Denied: Larry A. Bunch
Jason Wrote:
Since you accepted the definition at first, and then recanted
your acceptance, but provided us with no better definition, the
definition stands.
Larry Writes:
Definition of Xmas: A national holiday. Our proposition states,
".even if they (Christians observing Xmas, lab) attach no
religious significance to it."
Larry wrote:
One brother wrote me, "...a court case came down last year
...
Jason Wrote:
Regardless of what courts have ruled, a majority of people in
this country still view this holiday with religious significance,
furthermore, they see the displays that people put up as being
religious in nature. With no explanation what are people
supposed to think when they see such displays at your home?
Larry Writes:
If folks think Santa Clause and Frosty the Snowman are religious
symbols, I really feel sorry for them! If bright lights and
evergreen trees represent religious observances, then every store
in every town is worshipping during this national holiday!
Jason Wrote:
Suppose you were driving down the road . . . need to go to the
liquor store to use the phone. . . that was purely accidental!
Larry Writes:
The example I gave wasn't something accidental. It is a sin to
forsake the assemblies but if you come upon a bad accident on the
way to worship and stop to assist folks and miss the services,
have you sinned? Buying popcorn on the beer aisle of WalMart is
not accidental but neither is it sinful. Putting up Frosty the
snowman in the front yard is neither accidental nor sinful.
Jason Wrote:
When you display the SYMBOLS the world uses to commemorate the
birth of Christ, KNOWINGLY, you are without excuse.
Larry Writes:
Jason, I do NOT use SYMBOLS the world uses to commemorate the
birth of Christ! I do not put up 3 wise men, camels, donkeys,
representations of Mary and Joseph and a babe in a manger. I do
not put up a star or an angel representation. Nothing I put up
has anything to do with religion.
Jason Wrote:
Herein lies the rub! Does Christ wish for His birth to be
celebrated? Show me a scripture, please, where He does. Command,
example, inference, I'll take any of the three. You give
approval to what they do by what you do. How do they know,
Larry, that you're not going along with them?>
Larry Writes:
My observing a national holiday does not give approval to the way
other folks observe the same holiday. I do not observe it as the
birth of Christ, I do not give approval to that practice by
others, and to say that I do so by putting up bright lights, an
evergreen tree, exchanging presents, and having an emblem of a
jolly old elf is unjust. How do I know the Pentecostals do not
think I am one of them when they see me with my wife and she is
wearing a dress to the ankles, no makeup and no (excessive)
jewelry? That doesn't make it wrong for my wife to dress in this
manner! Nor for me to be seen with her!
Jason Wrote:
No, Larry, here's the limit, it's not arbitrary: Romans 15:2: .
. . How, pray tell, does the celebration of this holiday,
national or religious, edify your neighbor? How does it set the
right example?
Larry Writes:
This gets back to the fact that we cannot do everything that all
folks are in agreement with. Length of hair, dresses, wearing of
jewelry, and many other things will find disagreement and even
disdain from some quarters. To observe Dec.25th as a national
holiday does no ill to my neighbor. I will agree, however, it
does not edify him either, but neither does celebrating July 4th!
Jason Wrote:
It is self-serving, and men-pleasing to do what many do at this
Holiday season.
Larry Writes:
I suppose the same could be said about all holidays! That,
however, does not make it wrong and sinful. When you say "do what
many do" I 'm sure you have in mind observing Dec.25 as a
religious holiday. That, however, is not what I do! If observing
a national holiday on Dec.25 is self serving and men pleasing,
then observing July 4th reflects the same attitude!
Jason Wrote:
What would be wrong with a piano in the auditorium to play a
single note to pitch a song? You don't object to pitch-pipes, do
you? Same thing!
Larry Writes:
No, a piano is not the same thing as a pitch-pipe. Would you like
to debate that subject? (I'll not do it here, in this debate!)
Jason Wrote:
Compare Romans 14 with I Cor. 8 and 10. . . . Hope it's clear
now.
Larry Writes:
Clear as mud! :>) Argument answered already in above comments
concerning "symbols" of religious significance.
Jason Wrote:
You leave the impression of APPROVAL.
Larry Writes:
(sigh) Jason, if I put up a sign in the front of my house
stating: "Dec.25 has no religious significance" would that
placate you? Maybe a sign in front of Frosty: "NO RELIGIOUS
SIGNIFICANCE"! Must we always put up a sign denying what others
might think about what we are doing? Pin a sign on my wife's long
dress: "I am not a Pentecostal." Put a tag on my wedding ring:
"This is not to be thought of as excessive jewelry." (I don't
think so!)
Jason Wrote:
What's wrong with July 4? What's wrong with Thanksgiving? Two
holidays that have no religious significance to anyone?>
Larry writes:
No religious connotations? THANKSgiving? Nothing religious about
that? July 4th was not given as an example of anything religious,
but as a symbol of rebellion against the government! Folks see
you celebrating July 4th and think you are a rebel, not in
subjection to the government (Rom.13)!
Brotherly, Larry