BALLARD/STROM DEBATE ON BAPTISM
Bob Strom's Third Rebuttal
The Scriptures teach that water baptism to a believing penitent is for the remission
of his sins.
Affirm: Voyd N. Ballard
Deny: Bob Strom
Strom's denial to Ballard's Third AFFIRMATIVE ON BAPTISM
All Scripture quotations from NASB unless otherwise specified. Capital letters for
emphasis only. This response is a bit more direct than the last two, in hopes that it
will stir even more enthusiasm for this debate/topic. However it is not meant to
annoy or insult.
******************************************
First I would note that this debate has been thoroughly enjoyable - thanks to
Ballard and the forum for providing the venue. The reply chain is long and so I
have divided it into segments for easier reading. Enjoy!
Voyd
Bob has seesawed back and forth on when the sinner is saved until it is impossible
to determine what he really believes.
Bob
The posts show that I have stated consistently and repeatedly that the sinner is
saved the moment he accepts Christ. It is difficult to fathom how someone could
call that "seesawing".
Voyd
But there is not one place anywhere in the Bible where anyone was ever said to be
saved or justified by his faith until that faith acted in obedience to God.
Bob
Simply repeating your assertion without dealing with the response that was given
does nothing to promote your own position. There is no text dealing with faith
just prior to action and denying salvation as Ballard seems to hope. RATHER
there are texts that speak of faith (supposed faith) that REJECTs obedience (and
so is not really faith at all) - and it all speaks of SALVATION APART from
Works. (Helping us see that NO WORK, earns us salvation NOR is there any
work - except the WORK of believing Christ that is NEEDED to enter into
salvation). Once the BAD tree is changed to a GOOD one - many acts of
obedience can be expected to follow. (As we saw in Matt 7). Every time you state
that no text says man is justified by faith - I have pointed out that scripture clearly
says "We maintain that a man is justified by faith apart from the works of the
Law". This is NOT MERELY saying we are justified by faith - but is ALSO
saying "APART from works of the law" meaning salvation is not held off waiting
for us to get baptized. (in this case). When you try to juxtaposition faith against
obedience - saying that you can not be saved until some act of obedience - you
defeat your own argument for Baptismal regeneration - by admitting that the mere
act of BELIEVING is in ITSELF - a work of OBEDIENCE. As you already
pointed out --
Voyd
Faith in Christ is a work, "This is the work of God that ye believe on him whom
he hath sent." (Jno. 6:29)
The above is simply saying that when God commands man must obey to be
justified by God, and that justification has never come to any man until he did
obey the command.
Bob
While No such statement is found in scripture as we find Voyd making above –
yet we could possibly construe it to be true by observing that BELIEVING on
Christ IS WORK. With the result that Ballard's "Baptismal regeneration"
argument based on some work being done (before faith is "good enough" for
salvation) - suffers a fatal encounter with Ballard's own admission that BELIEF is
ITSELF work. The "work" is then DONE at the moment a man BELIEVES. No
need to remain UNSAVED - the faith and the work are BOTH fully present. (As
already noted).
==========================================================
Voyd
When Jesus commanded the Apostles to go into all the world and preach the
gospel He said, "He that believeth and is baptized shall be saved" (Mark 16:16)
No statement could possibly be plainer. Belief + Baptism = Salvation.
Bob
Again - repeating your previous argument without dealing with the compelling
response already given - does nothing to promote your argument. As already
noted IF we were to use the wooden logic above consistently THEN we would be
forced to also state you are not a born again, saved Christian - until you DIE.
Mark 13:13 "You will be hated by all because of My name, but the one who
endures to the end, he will be saved."
Matthew 24:13 ""But the one who endures to the end, he will be saved."
Matthew 10:22 "You will be hated by all because of My name, but it is the one
who has endured to the end who will be saved."
Clearly applying the wooden logic to these texts does not result in truth. Instead
of dealing with this problem as it was pointed out in my first rebuttal - Voyd is
ignoring it - I assume that is because it is devastating to the point he is making
here and he is left with no other choice but to move to another point.
=======================================================
Voyd
Belief minus Baptism is DEAD being alone (Jas.2)
Bob
Here is another favorite method - quoting yourself and then slapping a text at the
end as IF we could ever find such wording in that text. James 2 (the entire
chapter) makes no mention of baptism. AND as we have already agreed - the
mere act of BELIEVING on Christ - (true belief) IS ITSELF - Work (according to
Christ).
Voyd
If General Motors should announce that "He that believeth and is baptized shall
receive a New Cadillac" there would be such a stampede to the creeks, rivers, and
baptisteries as the world has never witnessed, and Bob Strom would lead that
stampede, and right behind him would come every Sectarian Preacher in this land.
Not a one of them would claim the Cadillac on his faith alone without baptism. I
said that to a Baptist preacher one time in an oral debate and that preacher spoke
up from his seat and said, "I would be the first man into the water", and if Bob
will be honest he will say the same. What say ye, Bob?
Bob
If General motors fully qualified that by adding "by the way I really mean that the
one that ENDURES until the END OF LIFE will get the car" we would all back-
off and review just how wooden our logic might be. Perhaps we have missed
something. THEN when we read the GM statement of Rom 10:9 If you
CONFESS with your mouth and BELIEVE With your heart PRESTO we give
you the car!! Well I am sure we wouldn't be waiting around - we would ask for it
- immediately.
Rom 10:9 >
Now focus here - NOTHING about "UNTO righteousness"
RATHER we have SAVED - (no "flavors" of saved - just SAVED). And further
we have "SALVATION" no flavors of salvation - just salvation. So we need not
be upset or sidetracked when we ALSO see righteousness RESULTING from all
this SALVATION. Just as Matt 7 states that the works/fruits RESULT from the
GOOD TREE that is ALREADY the GOOD TREE.
========================================================
Voyd
Matt.28:18-20 is a parallel passage to Mark 16:16. I pointed out in my last
affirmative that no one can be saved until and unless he comes INTO relationship
with God, Christ and the Holy Spirit. Bob says, "Ooops! Mistake again. Matt.28
tells us to MAKE disciples Then to Baptize." Quoting from the NASB. He
ignores the argument completely that, according to Jesus in this passage, we are
baptized INTO the name of God, Christ and the Holy Spirit.
Bob
Not exactly a quote of Matt 28 in this case it reads - "GO therefore and MAKE
DISCIPLES of all nations, Baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the
Son, and of the Holy Spirit" Clearly people must learn of the Trinity and learn of
their condition, ACCEPT that and even CHOOSE to be Disciples (learners)
THEN and only THEN are they Baptized. ALREAY having been MADE
DISCIPLES.
Voyd
I think Bob wells knows that a disciple is a "learner" or "follower" so when the
preaching of the gospel makes "learners" or "followers" of Christ they learn that
the Lord requires baptism
Bob
Yes they learn of Baptism and a myriad other things. As Paul stated in Heb 5 –
there are layers upon layers of learning that takes place - Baptism being one of
those things included in the early layers. BUT meaningful ONLY because they
have already chosen Christ, are ALREADY Christians, ARE ALREADY
disciples, ARE NOT the carnal lost person who is not filled with the spirit.
==================================================
Voyd
if they are to "follow" Him INTO this Divine relationship. No mistake here, and I
deny the allegation and charge the Alligator (Bob) to produce one passage of
Scripture where any person ever believed INTO Christ.
Bob
Let's read it again carefully ...
Rom 10:9 that if you confess with your mouth Jesus as Lord, and BELIEVE in
your heart that God raised Him from the dead, you will be SAVED;
10 for with the heart a person believes, resulting in righteousness, and with the
mouth he confesses, resulting in SALVATION.
Voyd
This passage (nor any other passage) proves salvation by FAITH ONLY.
Bob
It proves that Baptism IS NOT in the list as a barrier between the lost sinner and
salvation RATHER - as we see clearly in the text - we believe and confess - and
PRESTO! Saved.
Voyd
Sure the passage teaches that we are saved by faith, but faith leads us UNTO (in
the direction toward) salvation.
Bob
Being saved by faith - is already SALVATION. Saved - is saved. There are not
"flavors of Saved". Making things up like "yes by faith you are SAVED but also
you are saved UNTO salvation" is pointless. Saved is saved - Let's stick with the
text.
=========================================================
Voyd
I pointed out in my 2nd. Affirmative that: The Bible teaches that the sinner is
"dead in trespasses and sin." (Eph.2:1)
Bob
Your problem is that you are not exploring that fact - of the PRE SAVED person.
For it shows us that ALL further progress is IMPOSSIBLE. The ONLY thing that
can happen to change this is belief and SALVATION the New Birth that causes
OLD things to be passed away. ONLY IN the SPIRIT can SPIRITUAL things be
discerned and agreed to. 1Cor 2:14 But a natural man does not accept the things
of the Spirit of God, for they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand
them, because they are spiritually appraised.
Romans 8:6 For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the mind set on the Spirit is
life and peace,
7 because the mind set on the flesh is hostile toward God; for it does not subject
itself to the law of God, for it is not even able to do so,
8 and those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
=======================================================
Voyd
In order to leave the kingdom of sin (darkness) he must:
Hear the Gospel: Rom.10:17 - 1Cor.1:21
Believe in Christ: Jno. 8-24 - Heb. 11:6
Repent of sins: Acts 2:38 - Acts 17:30-31
Confess Christ: Acts 8:37 - Rom. 10:9
Be Baptized: Rom.6:3-4 - Gal. 3:26-29
In faith and repentance he dies to the love and practice of sin and in baptism he
dies to the guilt and state of sin.
Bob
As already noted in Romans8 and 1Cor2 dying to the practice and love of sin is
not something a lost person is going to do. In fact - it is impossible.
Voyd
The sinner believes UNTO-Repents UNTO-Confesses UNTO and is Baptized
INTO Christ.
Bob
Since no such text exists - I challenge Voyd to do better than simply quote
yourself to make the point. By that - I simply mean that you have not proven
anything by quoting yourself again.
Voyd<>
No need to - such artificial grammar is not present in scripture - nor is it needed
since God's Word says that when we simply BELIEVE in HIM - "you will be
saved". "WHOSOEVER BELIEVES in him should NOT perish but shall have
everlasting life" Bob said: "The mere act of accepting Christ is ITSELF obedience
- faith is completed."
Voyd
This is an unscriptural statement
Bob
Pay close attention --
Rom 10:9
Faith in Christ is a work, "This is the work of God that ye believe on him whom
he hath sent." (Jno. 6:29)
Bob
To accept Christ is to have a faith that will OBEY him by doing what he
commanded. He is the author of eternal salvation unto all them who obey
him.(Heb.5: 8-9)
Yep - and as you stated - the first WORK of FAITH is to BELIEVE on Christ
whom God the Father has sent.
==================================================
Voyd
Turning to the 2nd. chapter of Acts we find the Apostles preaching the dead,
buried, and resurrected Christ. When the people realized they were guilty of
crucifying the Lord they cried out to Peter and the rest of the Apostles, "Men and
brethren, what shall we do?" Then Peter said unto them, "Why, there is not a thing
in this world you can do. just believe on the Lord and you will receive the
remission of your sins." EH? Is that what Peter said? That is what Bob would
have said had he been the preacher there; That however, is a far cry from what the
inspired Peter told them. He said, "Repent, and be baptized everyone of you in the
name of Jesus Christ for the remission of sins, and ye shall receive the gift of the
Holy Spirit." (Acts 2:38)
Bob
Indeed - and perhaps it is helpful to note that the Holy Spirit follows as the
promised blessing because once the person has believed they are in full fellowship
with God and can therefore receive the Holy Spirit. (As I am sure Voyd will
agree). That is going to be very useful when we get to Acts 10 and find that Peter
goes to the unsaved preaches the entire Acts 10 message and at the end of acts 10
we have THE HOLY SPIRIT poured out BEFORE Baptism.
=========================================================
Voyd
Bob needs to prove what he is simply asserting, and he cannot do so by simply
citing passages showing that the sinner is not saved by works of man or by works of the "Old Law"
Bob
I have no text speaking of "Old Law" - you are simply quoting yourself again.
Voyd
Let him produce one passage proving that the sinner is not saved or justified by
the works of righteousness.
Bob
OK - Romans 3
Romans 3:20 because by the works of the Law NO FLESH WILL BE
JUSTIFIED in His sight; for through the Law comes the knowledge of SIN. (the
REAL LAW)
21 But now apart from the Law the righteousness of God has been manifested,
being witnessed by the Law and the Prophets,
22 even the righteousness of God through faith in Jesus Christ for all those who
believe; for there is no distinction;
23 for all have sinned and fall short of the glory of God,
24 being justified as a gift by His grace through the redemption which is in Christ
Jesus;
Voyd
His position is that the sinner is saved by faith before and without baptism. >>
Bob
Just as we saw in Acts 10.
=======================================================
Voyd
Bob said: (Voyd--But remember the faith that saves is the faith that obeys.)—
As stated in the previous rebuttal - that is not the point in dispute.
Yes Sir, That is the point in dispute. You are contending that the sinner is saved
by FAITH ALONE, before and WITHOUT OBEDIENCE, and I am contending
that the faith of the sinner is the faith that obeys. My position is that the sinner is
saved by FAITH and OBEDIENCE. Your position is that the sinner is saved by
FAITH ALONE- WITHOUT OBEDIENCE. Don't tell me "that is not the point of
dispute." The reading audience will know better whether you do or not.
Bob
As it turns out - I already know what I think. (:-> Since you have admitted that
BELIEF is in fact WORKS you have already undone your own argument. - and is
in fact the WORK of faith - your case has already been lost IF you base it on Faith
that works, because you already have it at the moment of belief in Christ by your
own admission. AND HENCE my statement above.
Voyd
Bob says "I do not find in Heb.11:7 'by faith the sinner being warned of Christ is
baptized into Christ to the saving of his soul'."
Yes, but you do find that "by faith Noah being warned of God prepared an ark"
don't you? That is my point, and you cannot successfully deny it.
Bob
As already stated - the fact that a saved person does obey God through faith is not
in dispute (no matter how much you would like it to be). RATHER the point in
dispute is "at what point is a person saved". You CLAIM the faith and work of
belief that comes BEFORE Baptism - WHILE GOOD and while obedient - are
not "enough obedience" for salvation. I claim that you are denying the scriptures
already presented on this subject to make such a claim. It is not whether ANY
OBEDIENCE will be there - but whether the WORK that Christ declares to exist
when faith is exercised and belief takes place is to be accepted for what Rom 10:9
says it is - a saving transaction.
==========================================================
Voyd
Bob says the sinner is saved the MOMENT he believes. Here is his exact
statement:
"At that moment - he is saved, forgiven, transformed (a new creation) reconciled
to God."
But the Bible teaches that reconciliation, forgiveness, and a new creation is IN
Christ. (2Cor.5:17 - Eph.2: 13-16 - Col. 1: 12-14) So if the sinner is saved,
forgiven, and reconciled the moment he believes he is saved, forgiven and
reconciled OUT of Christ,
Bob
You are merely rationalizing here Voyd. Scripture does not teach that people are
OUTSIDE of Christ even though they believe in him - and REMAIN OUTSIDE
of Christ UNITL they are baptized. You are simply making it up from the void of
what Romans 6 does NOT say.
Voyd
for the Bible plainly teaches that we are BAPTIZED INTO Christ. (Rom.6: 3- 4 –
Gal. 3: 26-27)
Bob
And does NOT say that UNTIL we engage in the public act of Baptism we are
OUTSIDE of Christ. You are arguing from the void of what it does not say. Even
the most casual reader will find that having the Holy Spirit (Spirit of Christ)
poured out on you - is not the experience of those OUTSIDE of Christ. Acts 10
utterly refutes the straw man you build from what Rom 6 does not say.
==========================================================
Voyd
Let me emphasize again that the Bible teaches that the sinner is "dead in
trespasses and sin." (Eph.2:1) In order to leave the kingdom of sin (darkness) he
must:
1 Hear the Gospel: Rom.10:17 - 1Cor.1:21
2 Believe in Christ: Jno. 8-24 - Heb. 11:6
3 Repent of sins: Acts 2:38 - Acts 17:30-31
4 Confess Christ: Acts 8:37 - Rom. 10:9
5 Be Baptized: Rom.6:3-4 - Gal. 3:26-29
In faith and repentance he dies to the love and practice of sin and in baptism he
dies to the guilt and state of sin.
Concerning the above Bob made the ridiculous and false statement:
"Step 5 can not be taken by a lost person as Paul points out in 1Cor 2 and Romans
8. By the time we get to step 5 we are way past the point that any lost person (not
born again, not walking in the spirit) could come to without already being born
again " a new creation with old things passed away".
Paul made no such point
Bob
Actually he makes that very point in 1Cor2 and Rom 8 here - perhaps a
refresher??
1Cor 2:14 But a natural man does not accept the things of the Spirit of God, for
they are foolishness to him; and he cannot understand them, because they are
spiritually appraised. Romans 8:6 For the mind set on the flesh is death, but the
mind set on the Spirit is life and peace, 7 because the mind set on the flesh is
hostile toward God; for it does not subject itself to the law of God, for it is not
even able to do so, 8 and those who are in the flesh cannot please God.
=========================================================
Voyd
Paul made the point that the servants of sin had become the servants of
righteousness by "obeying that form of doctrine which was delivered to them"
(Rom. 6: 16-18) It is ridiculous to say they were already the children of God
before they had obeyed
Bob
On the contrary - IF we review the texts above carefully we find it is
IMPOSSIBLE for them to come to obedience APART from the transformation of
the New Birth. In fact they will not even COMPREHEND the Spiritual thrust of
God's Word or even agree with it.
Voyd
Salvation is in Christ, and nowhere else (Acts 4: 12) and what Paul "points out" is
that we are baptized INTO Christ (Rom. 6: 3-4) Bob, just what do you suppose is
the matter with you to cause you to cite Matt. 7 and make such a statement?
Bob
Well let's actually LOOK at the text and see whether it says OBEDIENCE
produces the TRANFORMED - GOOD tree - or whether the TRANSFORMED
GOOD tree produces OBEDIENCE - I think that will clear it up.
Matt 7:16 You will know them by their fruits. Grapes are not gathered from thorn
bushes nor figs from thistles, are they?
17 So every good tree bears good fruit, but the bad tree bears bad fruit.
18 A good tree cannot produce bad fruit, nor can a bad tree produce good fruit.
19 Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire.
20 So then, you will know them by their fruits.
The GOOD TREE comes first THEN the GOOD fruit SHOWING that in fact the
GOOD TREE is producing fruit. Done.
=========================================================
Voyd
Don't come back and cite Rom. 10: 9 again because I have already shown that the
belief and confession in this passage is UNTO righteousness.>>
Bob
Apparently you are still ignoring the devastating feature of Rom 10 Rom 10:9
Bob says: "Your assertion remains unproven."
But it so happens that I have made NO assertions. I have given you Book,
Chapter, and Verse, setting forth the Lord's plan of salvation. I have shown that
salvation is in Christ and that the ONLY way to get into Christ is to be baptized
INTO Him. (Rom. 6: 3-4 - Gal.3:26-29)
Bob
In fact you have not shown that the only way to come into contact with Christ is
to first - (in your lost state), decide for Christ, believe in Christ, agree with His
word and then choose to be baptized. Rather you have argued from the void of
what Rom 6 and Gal 3 do not say - to try and make them say "No contact with
Christ until Baptism".
Voyd
Works of man: Eph.2: 8-9 B> Works of the Old Law: Rom. 3:20 C> Works of
God or Righteousness: Jno. 6:28-29 ...
Bob says, "Again it appears that your assertion "Old Law" is not found in the
text."
Voyd<>
Bad assumption - rather you should assume that all of Heb 8 does not contain the
phrase "old law" nor does the 13th verse. You simply make it up. You are making
a mistake by citing a chapter and verse - but then quoting yourself.
=======================================================
Voyd
In Rom. 4: 1-3 Paul affirms that Abraham was not saved by works and quotes
Gen.15: 26 to prove it. In Jas.2: 21-23 James affirms that Abraham was saved by
WORKS and quotes the same Old Testament Scripture (Gen. 15:26) to prove it.
Did these two Apostles contradict each other? GOD FORBID! >
Bob says: "Actually - James 2 does not say "Abraham was saved by Works". He
says that Abraham was justified by works."
Yes, and Paul says Abraham was NOT JUSTIFIED by works (Rom. 4:2)
Now are these two inspired men contradicting each other? Paul was talking about
the works of the law and James was talking about the works of obedience.
Bob
But having that bit of clarity does not relieve you of your error in saying that
Abraham was "Saved by works" - another quote of you - not of James 2. I am
appealing for accuracy here - stick with the text when trying to quote it.
========================================================
Voyd
Bob says, "By faith only"- James says, "NOT by faith only."
You take your choice. I'll take James. He was inspired
Bob says "I'll take Paul - He was inspired. What a silly position - we have to take
them both."
Quite correct Bob. We have to take them both, and I was not saying we had to
choose between Paul and James
Bob
It was hard to see that from the way you were posting.
=======================================================
Voyd
2. Acts chapters 10 & 11 is a record of the conversion of Cornelius. He was told
to send for Peter, "Who shall tell thee words whereby thou and thy house shall be
saved." Peter commenced those words by telling Cornelius, "in every nation he
that feareth him and worketh righteousness, is accepted with him." (Acts 10:35)
At the close of Peter's sermon he commanded them to be baptized in the name of
the Lord.
Bob says,"!! another mistake. Cornelius AND his family RECEIVE the
outpouring of the Holy Spirit BEFORE being Baptized."
Yes, and they received the outpouring of the Spirit before they heard the words,
Bob
Wrong again. Don't argue from the void of what the text does not say - it's a
mistake. As you reference the detailed account in Acts 10 AFTER Peter's sermon
in Acts 10:34-43 Peter's sermon in which we find the Gospel - 10:44-46 the
unbaptized gentiles are filled with the Spirit of Christ the Holy Spirit - 10:47-48
AND THEN - Baptized This is utterly devastating to your position because it
takes the Acts 2 sequence and PROVES that FELLOWSHIP with God - is NOT
predicated on FIRST being Baptized. Had you just noticed this one point alone –
you might have saved yourself the trouble.
Voyd
"whereby thou and thy house shall be saved." Peter said the outpouring of the
Spirit came "as I began to speak" (Acts 11: 15) Before he had spoken the words
that would save them
Bob
Classic error in arguing from the void of what the text does not say - not only do
you get an error that can't be reconciled with scripture regarding Baptism, you
also have an error in the Acts 10 account that can't be reconciled with Acts 11
since you stretch to get Acts 11 to say they were baptized BEFORE Peter's
sermon - where Acts 10 CLEARLY shows the full DETAILS - and shows they
were baptized AFTER the sermon (though possibly Peter had much more to say
and this is what is referenced in chapter 11). In any case - you are sacrificing the
scripture at the altar of your own defense. Stick with the text and abandon the
void of what Acts 11 is not saying. This concludes my 3rd denial. It has been a
treat - I will now work on the affirmative. It will take a few days. (Hopefully it
will be short so we can expand with the iterations)